This is a political science class and I am suppose to pick any case study related to political science. So I chose the topic which is "Miranda Rights". Below is the rubric that should be follow when writing the paper: Directions: 1. Precise which Political case you are treating in this paper. 2. Say what are your own knowledge of this case 3. If you use any source to relate this experience please give the reference (book, articles, Website, Weblog …). 4. Paper should not exceed two pages. (Not counting title page or reference page). 5. Use APA formatting and style. Grading rubric Criteria Points possible Points earned Introduction: paper has appropriate introduction introducing the topic matter and leading into the body of the paper 5 Description of what yo0u know about the case 2 Details and facts (avoiding to tell generalities) 10 Analytical part of the paper, where you imply the theoretical aspect of the case with the factual dimension of the topic. 10 Conclusion you draw from the description of the case 5 Formatting: APA, title page, citations, references, font, 2-3 pages 5 Utilization of references to complete your presentation. 3 Total points 40 source..
Date of Submission
Miranda rights popularly known as Miranda warning are the defendant rights which are invoked by police immediately upon arrest. The principle of Miranda right is to advise all criminals of their rights before an interrogation. The wording of Miranda right vary, but all that matters is the message communicated. The arresting officer must ensure that the suspects understand their rights by either understanding English or through translation. The intention of Miranda rights is protection of suspect’s Fifth Amendment rights to refuse answering questions that are self incriminating (MirandaWarning.Org, 2010). The Miranda rights go into effect after an arrest where a suspect is informed that questioning is voluntary and are free to leave at any time. The placing of suspects under arrest without reading the Miranda rights, spontaneously or voluntary statements may be used in court such as the use of excuses by suspects in justifying why they committed a crime. The Miranda warning is all about questioning and the protection of suspects from self incriminating under the Fifth Amendment. Questions may be asked without being Mirandized if it concerns the safety of the public and evidence obtained may be used against the suspect.
The case of Howes v. Fields, a question is brought forth regarding whether an inmate confession to sex crimes should have been suppressed as the prisoner did not receive the warning required by Miranda right before interrogation. The answer provided is whether t he suspect was in custody at the time of interrogation. Custody was decided as a term that specified the circumstances which are generally perceived to present danger of coercion. The inmate was servin...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
By admin In Essay Samples On November 19, 2017
The ethical issues presented in this case are dealing with employees not being honest with their employer. The sale reps of the company were reporting fictitious expenses because the company does not require them to turn in any receipts. Since they do not require receipts, the employees took it upon themselves to add 25% when they filled out their expense vouchers, instead of being honest. The employees stated, “The Company did not really need the money because it was very profitable. Therefore, the employees were not being honest and in return, they were receiving more profit than they should have. Ann did not want Jane to report the correct expenses, which was unethical. Jane should have followed her initial thought, which was to report the fictitious expenses to someone of a higher authority. Even though Ann may have not been happy about Jane going to authorities higher than her, others in the company would have shown gratitude to Jane for being honest and doing the right thing.
Jane and the company could have to deal with several consequences for not reporting the right expenses. Jane could lose her Job for not reporting what she knew about others being dishonest and if she followed the example of others in the many who were reporting higher amounts than they should have, both Jane and Ann could lose their Jobs along with others in the company. Loyalty and integrity are two ethical principles that would be useful in this specific case.
By reporting the fictitious expenses of Ann and others, Jane would maintain personal integrity by doing the right thing and would earn the trust of others. Being loyal to the company that Jane is working for would also be a good ethical principle that would be useful here. By reporting these things, Jane would be loyal to her organization and gain trust of others in this way as well. Phantom Expenses By Lakes-Ward
We specialize in writing essays
Forget about that homework for less than $13.90/page